Skip to content
BAICE Logo
BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR
INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE EDUCATION
Join BAICE Log in
    • Supporting research
    • Building capacity and networks
    • Influencing policy and practice
    • Disseminating knowledge
  • About BAICE
    • Executive Committee
    • Partner Organisations
  • Funding
  • News & Events
  • Conference 2024
  • Membership
    • Benefits
    • Students
    • Join BAICE
  • Journal
    • Compare Editorial Board
    • Compare Book Reviews
    • Compare Forum
    • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
    • PhD Abstracts
    • Services and Support for Writers
  • Media Hub
PhD Abstracts
> Compare > PhD Abstracts > Discourses of incapacity and emancipation: an autoethnographic study of CPD courses delivered by Western educators in a Ugandan context

Discourses of incapacity and emancipation: an autoethnographic study of CPD courses delivered by Western educators in a Ugandan context

Author:
Sharon Smith
Institution:
University of Chester
Awarded:
2020

This thesis examines the complex nature of teacher-led professional development delivered by Western teachers in a Non-Western context. I use an autoethnographic approach and employ a range of reflective and reflexive methods, such as visual images, journals, interviews and sketches to expose and explore the tensions experienced when engaging with CPD in a culture vastly different to my own and within a post-colonial context.

This thesis employs theories from Homi Bhabha to explore the key concepts of post-colonialism and decolonisation, Zygmunt Bauman to examine the concepts of community and identity, and Jacques Rancière and Etienne Wenger to explore theories of education and learning such as stultification and emancipation and communities of practice, all of which are pivotal in understanding the complexities and tensions of experience throughout this research.

I scrutinise moments of dis-ease, a term borrowed from Sweetman (2003, p.528), whereby the programme appears rooted in a form of neo-colonialism fuelled by globalised models of education that reinforces little more than a discourse of incapacity and a reiteration of a single story of African Otherness. Conversely, I also observe moments where there emerges a community of practice that offers an emancipatory model of education and offers participants the opportunity to reinscribe their identities as part of a global community.

I conclude that programmes such as this have the potential to be both positive and negative and that, unlike examples of voluntourism in which the participants serve to create and perpetuate deficit-models of colonialist thinking, there is a need to accept that participants engaging in professional discourse have the capacity to review and decide whether the positive impacts are valid and valued enough to make their pursuit worthwhile. It is critical to resist the urge to make a sweeping generalisation about CPD programmes in vastly different cultural contexts because too many variables exist to make such a broad stroke accurate, but there must be an onus on all involved to evaluate the ramifications of participation and to continue or desist in these programmes as is appropriate.

Compare

  • Compare Editorial Board
  • Compare Book Reviews
  • Compare Forum
  • Compare Forum Guidelines
  • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
  • PhD Abstracts
  • Services and Support for Writers

    Downloads

    • Compare Writers Programme_092013 (731 kB)
      03.11.2013
  • Journal Retrospective Study Report

Quick Links

  • BAICE Funding
  • Membership
  • Compare Journal
  • Contact BAICE

Policies

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility Statement

Connect with us

Follow us on Twitter


© BAICE 2023

Limited Company in England No. 13564154 with Registered Charity No. 1198916
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}