Skip to content
BAICE Logo
BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR
INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE EDUCATION
Join BAICE Log in
    • Supporting research
    • Building capacity and networks
    • Influencing policy and practice
    • Disseminating knowledge
  • About BAICE
    • Executive Committee
    • Partner Organisations
  • Funding
  • News
  • Conference
  • Membership
    • Benefits
    • Students
    • Join BAICE
  • Journal
    • Compare Editorial Board
    • Compare Book Reviews
    • Compare Forum
    • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
    • PhD Abstracts
    • Services and Support for Writers
  • Media Hub
PhD Abstracts
> Compare > PhD Abstracts > Separate to Unite: the Paradox of Education in Deeply Divided Societies

The thesis explores the interface between political systems and education reform in societies emerging from violent identity-based conflicts. It evaluates the political function of formal education in deeply divided societies, and highlights constraints and opportunities for education reform in jurisdictions that adopt consociational power-sharing to manage civil wars.

It does so by comparing initiatives for the reform of formal education in Lebanon, Northern Ireland and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Macedonia) since the Taif Agreement (1989), the Belfast Agreement (1998) and the Ohrid Agreement (2001), respectively. The three agreements are similar in two respects. First, they established consociational power-sharing to regulate Lebanon’s civil war (1975-1989), Northern Ireland’s troubles (1968-1998) and Macedonia’s conflict (2001). Consociations provide for the inclusion of all relevant religious, ethnic or national communities in political and non-political institutions through executive power-sharing, proportional representation, mutual veto rights and communal autonomy. Second, the three peace agreements presented schools as important instruments for furthering long-term peace. They mapped reforms in history education, citizenship education and languages, and auspicated more initiatives for contact among children of different ethnic, religious and national backgrounds.

In four separate chapters, this thesis compares reforms in the areas of history education, citizenship education and languages of instruction, as well as in the overall structure of compulsory education, after peace agreements in Lebanon, Northern Ireland and Macedonia. Each chapter evaluates the extent to which the principles and practices of consociational power-sharing influenced and constrained education policy. An additional chapter provides the essential historical background to the comparative analysis. The analysis is grounded in an extensive review of the literature on consociational power-sharing and social identity, and draws on the specific literature about history education, citizenship education, languages of instruction, and the contact hypothesis. It is based on extensive original data, including over 75 interviews carried out by the author in the three jurisdictions in 2012-13.

The thesis shows that post-conflict education reforms in Lebanon, Northern Ireland and Macedonia rarely fulfilled the integrationist aspirations of the peace agreements. Rather, through the manifest and hidden curricula, formal schooling tends to reproduce the core narratives and hierarchies underpinning power-sharing in the three consociations. This study suggests that consociations may generate consociational education systems, which help reproduce the political system’s basic building blocks: the mutually exclusive confessional, ethnic, national and political communities, which participated to conflict and currently share political power.

This thesis contributes both to the field of comparative education and to the field of conflict management. It adds to the latter by confirming that formal education is important to the resilience of peace processes: consociational education systems further the short-term stability of power-sharing by reproducing its core narratives and hierarchies. However, they may also plant the seeds of future conflicts by conveying mutually excusive narratives of identity to children belonging to different ascriptive groups in deeply divided societies. As to its implications for the field of comparative education, this thesis highlights that, despite the integrationist intents of peace agreements, a paradox characterises education systems in consociations. Initiatives that promote unity and integration in schools tend to generate backlashes against assimilation among the local population. This suggests that the structure and nature of political systems need to be taken into account when designing post-conflict education reforms. Specifically, if schools are to further social cohesion and transition out of conflict in consociations, they need to accommodate the separate institutions and mutually exclusive identity-forming narratives of the local communities which engaged in violent conflict and currently participate, to political power.

ku.ca1680186300.lck@1680186300anatn1680186300of.1.1680186300attid1680186300uiG1680186300">Giuditta Fontana

Compare

  • Compare Editorial Board
  • Compare Book Reviews
  • Compare Forum
  • Compare Forum Guidelines
  • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
  • PhD Abstracts
  • Services and Support for Writers

    Downloads

    • Compare Writers Programme_092013 (731 kB)
      03.11.2013
  • Journal Retrospective Study Report

Connect with us

Follow us on Twitter


Quick Links

  • BAICE Funding
  • Membership
  • Compare Journal
  • Contact BAICE

Policies

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility Statement

© BAICE 2023

Limited Company in England No. 13564154 with Registered Charity No. 1198916
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}