Skip to content
BAICE Logo
BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR
INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE EDUCATION
Join BAICE Log in
    • Supporting research
    • Building capacity and networks
    • Influencing policy and practice
    • Disseminating knowledge
  • About BAICE
    • Executive Committee
    • Partner Organisations
  • Funding
    • Seedcorn and research network grants
    • BAICE Thematic Forum Grants
    • Student Fieldwork Grants
    • Conference Bursaries
    • Student Essay Prize
    • Compare Writing Champions Grant
    • Compare Fellowship
  • News
  • Conference
    • Theme & Sub-themes
    • Committee
    • Registration
    • Abstracts
    • Programme Summary
    • Full Programme
    • Live-Streamed Sessions
    • Information
    • Student/ECR Workshop
    • Keynote Speakers
    • Tribute to Lalage Brown
    • Sponsors
    • Downloads
  • Membership
    • Benefits
    • Students
    • Join BAICE
  • Journal
    • Compare Editorial Board
    • Compare Book Reviews
    • Compare Forum
    • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
    • PhD Abstracts
    • Services and Support for Writers
  • Media Hub
PhD Abstracts
> Compare > PhD Abstracts > The discursive and social practices of actors in Benin involved in the provision of pre-school and primary education in the context of the 2010 decentralisation policy

The discursive and social practices of actors in Benin involved in the provision of pre-school and primary education in the context of the 2010 decentralisation policy

Author:
Eva Bulgrin
Institution:
School of Education and Social Work, University of Sussex
Awarded:
August 2020

This qualitatively oriented, in-depth study explores how the decentralisation policy in Benin (West Africa) is discursively and socially constructed, and how actors involved in the provision of pre- and primary education mediate this policy. Education decentralisation is a critical topic reflected in the national education strategy in Benin and much-debated amongst scholars and practitioners in the field of international education and development since the emergence of the global ‘good governance’ agenda in the 1990s.

The conceptual framework draws on literature about the concept of decentralisation (Rondinelli, 1980, 1990; Cheema and Rondinelli, 2007) and policy analysis (Ball, 1993, 1997, 2015; Rizvi and Lingard, 2010). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) (Fairclough 2013; Fairclough 2010) and actor-network theory (ANT) (Latour, 1996, 2005; Fenwick and Edwards, 2010) inform the analysis of the policy tensions and mediation. The empirical research draws on qualitative data, including 68 semi-structured interviews carried out in 2017 with high and middle-ranking officials from the Education and the Decentralisation Ministry as well as their sub-units. It also includes focus groups with teachers and parents in a Northern and a Southern field site in Benin.

This policy study finds that it is underpinned by the discourses of development and modernisation and reflects Benin’s colonial and post-colonial legacies and development trajectory. It also reports that the policy as enacted results in a multiplicity of social practices of actors at the national, regional and local levels in Benin. Finally, the findings suggest that exogenous factors as well as endogenous factors influenced the construction of the policy in 1990.

This research contributes to the understanding of education governance in the Global South, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa. It provides insights into how local, national and global factors influence the policy of education decentralisation in Benin. As such, this study offers a holistic understanding of the emergence and implementation of decentralisation reforms in Benin, contributing to a deeper understanding of how policymakers discount local policy knowledge.

Compare

  • Compare Editorial Board
  • Compare Book Reviews
  • Compare Forum
  • Compare Forum Guidelines
  • Recent Compare Forum Pieces
  • PhD Abstracts
  • Services and Support for Writers

    Downloads

    • Compare Writers Programme_092013 (731 kB)
      03.11.2013
  • Journal Retrospective Study Report

Connect with us

Follow us on Twitter


Quick Links

  • BAICE Funding
  • Membership
  • Compare Journal
  • Contact BAICE

Policies

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility Statement

© BAICE 2023

Limited Company in England No. 13564154 with Registered Charity No. 1198916
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}