Making time for writing in academia remains to be challenging. As initial studies have shown, it is especially difficult for young female researchers in the ongoing context of the pandemic, with sharp inequalities in knowledge production often at the expense of researchers in and from the Global South. This contrasts with the requirement, particularly for early-career researchers (ECRs), to publish fast and in high-ranking journals to ‘develop’ and ‘sustain’ in academia.
Our workshop for ECRs takes up the conference theme of ‘Partnerships in education’ to offer a shared and collective space for writing and reflecting. As ECRs ourselves, we conceptualise the workshop to think collaboratively and write generatively from feminist, post- and decolonial perspectives (Ashcroft et al., 1995; Danvers et al., 2019; Griffiths & Tiffin, 2003; Richardson, 2001). The 90-minute workshop provides balanced input, time to write, and space to exchange and cover a combination of academic and creative writing techniques.
Dealing creatively with the private and the public self in academic writing, we introduce participants to two types of writing: internal and outreach writing (Connell, 2015). Writing for the self, internal writing is mainly informal writing and includes, but is not limited, to fieldwork diaries, observations, interview transcripts and even emails. Outreach writing takes the findings to wider audiences, such as workshops, popular science and social media.
In the taking up of our ‘selves’, we focus on the fluidity and ‘dynamic’ of writing to challenge fixities through our work and research in education. Our interest in this workshop lies in the (re)claiming and foregrounding of the ‘I’ or self to acknowledge writing as personal as well as political. By critically reflecting on the centrality of power, researcher positionality and language in writing, our aim is to discuss the inseparability of the researcher from the writing and the im/possibilities and un/certainties of capturing truth (Hunt, 2013; Wadhwa, 2021).
Thinking of feminist writing as a method of discovery, always done in specific, local and historical contexts. Academic writing is always writing about our lives (Richardson, 2001), simultaneously acknowledging that we are part of a wider community. As such, feminist writing helps us to think collectively and reflexively about the process and product of writing in creative and critical ways (Danvers et al., 2019).
Thinking of post- and decolonial writing as a commitment to language and epistemic recognition: Unlearning institutional language still dominating knowledge frameworks, reinstating unequal power relations and patterns of coloniality. Listening to the tonality of words and conveying endogenous meanings, e.g. ‘language’, ‘home’, ‘here’, as suggested by Dennis Lee in his claim to the ‘cadence of the presence’ (in Ashford et al., 1995, 397-401).
Thinking of feminist, post- and decolonial writing is about paying attention to context, our positionality and involvement in the research as colonial subjects or writers in between colonial spaces. Playing with language, getting out of our comfort zone, pushing our thinking and writing towards an end, we don’t know yet. So we look forward to welcoming you and engaging together in a collaborative process of thinking collectively and reflexively about ourselves as writers and our writing.
References
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1995). The post-colonial studies reader (B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (eds.)). Routledge.
Connell, R. (2015). Writing for research strategies. Research Strategies, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-3310(97)90002-1
Danvers, E., Hinton-Smith, T., & Webb, R. (2019). Power, pedagogy and the personal: feminist ethics in facilitating a doctoral writing group. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1456423
Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2003). Empire Writes Back : Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=4976913
Hunt, C. (2013). Transformative Learning Through Creative Life Writing : Exploring the Self in the Learning Process.
Richardson, L. (2001). Getting personal: Writing-stories. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390010007647
Wadhwa, G. (2021). Ethics of Positionality in Capturing Adivasi Youth ‘Voices’ in a Village Community in India. In G. Spencer (Ed.), Ethics and Integrity in Research with Children and Young People (pp. 89–103). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820210000007011
Dr Eva Bulgrin is a Research Fellow at the University of Münster (Germany), a Research Associate at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (South Africa), and an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Sussex (UK). Her research interests extend from basic to higher education, and include post-structural, feminist and postcolonial theories; issues of quality, equity & inclusion; governance, globalisation, democracy & power.
Dr Gunjan Wadhwa is a Lecturer in Education at Brunel University London and a Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Sussex. Her research interests involve sociology of education and international development, with a focus on identities, youth, gender and citizenship and drawing on postcolonial and decolonial studies, enriched through feminist and poststructural frameworks.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
